Category Archives for Articles
Any Trade With a Stop Is a Good Trade
There was one change that improved my profitability as a trader and had more impact on my account and my life than anything else I’ve ever done. That was my decision in 2022 to stop allowing negativity and pessimism to form my beliefs. Instead, I chose to constantly find something to be bullish about, get long, and let price show me when I was wrong. My initial foray into the stock market almost 20 years ago was not a profitable endeavor, partly due to the fact that my desire for wealth was greater than my skill in attaining it, but largely due to my persistent negative mindset. In retrospect, I can see now what I could not see then: my beliefs were not aligned with winning. I was reminded of my old habits recently while talking with friends who insisted their money troubles were due to “the system” being set up against them. I certainly won’t dismiss their valid concerns about the systematic devaluation of our money, but as I pointed out to them, gold has already compensated us for the risks inherent to our fiat currency system. While, in general, I sympathize with their feeling that the necessities of life are becoming less attainable due to “the system,” what I find far more problematic to their particular situation is a negative mindset, a belief that gaining wealth is impossible, which leads to behaviors that ensure that it is. Once you believe you can’t, you’ve ensured you’ll miss all the opportunities that prove the contrary. I recognized immediately my own former limiting beliefs in their expression of concern. When I believed the system was aligned against me, I traded like it. I took small wins out of fear the market would take them back. I allowed losers to take up long term residency on my position statement because I was certain with a little more time I would be proven correct. I was trading poorly, like someone with all manner of insecurities and unhelpful attitudes towards money and that views themselves a victim of forces beyond their control. Belief is a powerful force that can allow you to see the positive or limit your mind’s eye to only seeing the negatives life brings your way. For reasons I’m still trying to pin down in my middle aged years, my former beliefs in my youth had created a negative bias through which I viewed the world and my trading. With such a negative bias, I wasn’t able to see the market for what it is: an endless stream of opportunities waiting to be exploited and a means to a better life. The way out of this negative bias is simple but not easy; it comes down to a choice each of us, as traders, must make for ourselves. I had to make the choice to trust in my ability to consistently show up, wait for setups I recognize, get in without hesitation, and get out without regrets. Of course this approach required an immense amount of study and practice before I was able to deploy my approach at a large enough scale for professional speculation. My study included analyzing thousands of my trades over many years. The main takeaway from my analysis is this: stops keep my account in tact. I need my account near all time highs to aggressively allocate to whatever trend I find developing. There is only going to be one, maybe two big trends a year that I can take advantage of to pump my account to new levels. There will always be uncertainty as to exactly when a new trend is developing, but with stops, I can limit my risk of loss and try repeatedly to get into what I think is a developing trend. But what is the next trend? All my analysis leads me to conclude that the underlying forces that will create the next trend are building underneath the surface level of index prices we see on the tape. It’s still my view that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and because of this, we should see economic and inflation pressure subside within the next three to six months. That should bring down the long end of the yield curve, but the market doesn’t agree with me right now. I’m not fighting it. I’m letting my analysis of price structure take me out of a losing trade with TLT. Was it a bad trade? Absolutely not. I followed my plan exactly, and I did it in the appropriate size, which has always been my weak spot. As long as I follow my process, I’m not going to get overly concerned about losses. New opportunities will come, and having the confidence to move aggressively when I see a setup I recognize is what will get me in a good trade. For TLT, I’m out with a small loss, but I’ll keep stalking this for a better setup to get long when the market is more agreeable to my view. My account is still within a stone’s throw of all time highs, and I plan on keeping it there. Until I take them out and spend them, the dollars in my account are simply ammunition in my armory that will be needed for battle. A big trend that will pump my account to a new level will come. That’s what the market promises, that prices will always move. When the forces align that move prices in a trend, that is the time to engage in battle. Until that time, I’ll defend my account with small skirmishes that are required to not take any more losing months this year. March was my only down month, and that was due to TLT as well. I’ve had to sell off my positions in fertilizer and energy stocks to offset my loss in TLT for September, but I’ve done so after concluding that locking in good gains is more important than positioning for me
Continue Reading -->Knowing When To Press Your Bets
Last week I laid out my case for a top in long rates on US Treasury Bonds. This week, I’m growing more confident that an important low in the price of US Bonds has been made. However, I’m still a fair weather fan, so I’ll be out in a heartbeat without remorse if my stops are hit. It’s been my view that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and if that view is correct, we should see growth and inflation expectations start to come down for 2027. This shifting dynamic is what can finally put a bid under US Bonds. This is because there will always be demand for income. When I was running an equity portfolio for a small RIA shop, I had to stretch way out the risk curve far beyond where I was comfortable playing to get the portfolio yield just barely into the 3% figure. I was buying foreign telecom OTC equities to get there. This was during the financial repression of the QE era, and it was not a good time to be a dividend portfolio manager. Today, we are being offered higher yield, even above what I had to stretch for back then, in a money market. You can lock in way higher than that if you are willing to extend duration a decade or more. The TLT, my preferred way to play the top in yields, pays a monthly div of ¢33, about 4.7%. This may not look exciting compared to the gains you can get from a well placed equity trade, but believe me, 4.7% return with no risk is nothing to shake a stick at. The unfortunate reality is that at the moment, there is nothing more attractive than US Bonds for my irreplaceable capital. I’ve been in about 75% cash since March, 2026 when I peeled off the last of my gold miners I was willing to part with (I’ve still got my core position in the big 5 miners) so I’ve been looking for another core position in which to allocate. Stocks are just not attractive other than trades right now because they are all trading at about 20x pretax earnings across the board; no matter what sector you look at, every single stock worth owning trades at basically 20x what you can expect it to earn every year. The only exceptions are the oils like XOM and CVX which trade about 15x and my favorite fertilizer, NTR, which trades about 12x what I estimate is an average of earnings over a cycle. These names can still offer potential for reward with the small chance of an energy or grain price spike, but the risk is shifting to the downside as the Iran conflict seems to be nearing a conclusion, or at the very least, a de-escalation. Any way I analyze the attractiveness of stocks for ownership, I come up lacking any justification for anything other than renting specific names for a trade. In an environment like this, it’s best to just stick with the easy trade, and for me, TLT is the easiest one out there. If the lows of this week hold in TLT, then my focus will shift towards deciding where to add. Proper speculation requires only averaging up, never down. Stan Druckenmiller said the key to his success was forming a trade idea, putting on a position, then really stepping on the gas and levering up when his position started to work. I want to apply the same logic to TLT. The first step is seeing the TLT hold the lows of this week at about $81.75. The next step would be to see some strength above $83. A weekly close above $83 on strong volume would be some indication that it would be time to press on TLT with tight stops below $83. This TLT play feels a lot like my gold trade that won me the ability to trade for myself, but this time, I’m going to apply the lessons I learned from that campaign. I did almost everything wrong during that speculative campaign: I averaged down, didn’t have a trade plan, didn’t use stops, had no risk control, etc. The only thing that made the trade work out for me was size. I was 90% long in one sector because I was confident in my analysis. I used 8th grade math to plot the dollar value of US debt going back 50 years, and used an R-squared regression to get a y=mx+b equation. I plugged in the year 2030 for “b”, and got $45T for our debt. I then took the current portion of foreign held debt outstanding at 20%, and I asked, if even 1% of that dollar value shifts to gold, what would the supply and demand balance look like? It turns out, that at the time I performed this basic analysis in 2023, the new demand for gold would be 4.5 tons at the $2,000 price gold was then, and new supply would be only 2 tons by 2030. It was a no brainer, and the trade worked out. This time around, I’m going to still rely on my analysis that we’re in the contraction phase which means growth and inflation should be coming down, but I’m going to adhere to strict risk controls to put on my TLT allocation. Each time I see a higher low hold, I’ll treat that as a new tactical spot to buy stock to add to my strategic core position. Like Druck’s playbook, if the trade starts to work, then and only then will I add. The reason I can be so confident in my analysis that we are in the contraction phase, is because all the signs I’ve been looking for are appearing. I’m relying on signs to form a checklist approach to pinpointing the turn in the cycle rather than hard data points because a data-driven, statistical modeling approach is notoriously wrong at turning points. Modeling
Continue Reading -->AI Just Went Bonkers
What a week! We had a jobs report, a massive earnings beat from Dell (DELL), and a big Tesla (TSLA) Robotaxi event. So let’s dig in: Skip Ahead! Dell & the Gang Confirmed AI Demand Is BonkersMemory Is Back on TopEuphoria Is Missing In ActionThe Great Rate Debate ContinuesNext Week Is Oracle and Econo-themedThe Pristine Mentorship Is Open Dell & the Gang Confirmed AI Demand Is BonkersNvidia (NVDA) impressed with its incredible guidance on its August 26 earnings report. And Dell (DELL) did the same on Tuesday, forecasting full-year revenues 11% above consensus. We also had strong AI-driven results this week from Broadcom (AVGO), Ciena (CIEN), Snowflake (SNOW), NetApp (NTAP), and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE). Demand for AI infrastructure is just bonkers. As good as industry earnings are, they’d be even better if not for shortages of inputs like memory and good old-fashioned electricity! Remember, Nvidia guided for 70% revenue growth vs. Wall Street expectations of 44%. But its growth would be more like 100% if it could actually meet demand. And this is a company that is facing increasing competition from its own customers, who are racing to build chips in-house! David Prince of T3’s Inner Circle discussed Dell and other key names in this video: Memory Is Back on TopWith all the bullish AI news, it’s no shocker that memory & storage stocks are leading the market to start September, with the Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) up 4%.DRAM has become one of the most popular ETFs in the market, trading over 23 million shares per day. SanDisk (SNDK) in particular had a big day on Friday, up 10%. Maybe we should have listened to Sami Abusaad Tuesday when he made SanDisk his #1 name. Euphoria Is Missing In ActionThe latest AAII Sentiment Survey shows that 39.7% of investors are bullish.This is the first week of above-average bullishness since July 15. So does that mean the crowd is positive? Not exactly. 39.7% isn’t even in the neighborhood of euphoric, and it’s not far from the long-term average of 37.5%. Plus, CNN’s Fear & Greed Index is at just 42/100.This is because many of Fear & Greed’s inputs like new 52-week highs are at historically low levels. Euphoria is missing from this market.The Great Rate Debate ContinuesOn Friday, President Trump told the Fed to cut rates. Or else he’ll stop trade with certain countries that have surpluses. But what is the market pricing in? The CME’s FedWatch Tool shows the market is now pricing in a 58% chance of a 25 bps rate hike this month. And it’s pricing in an 86% chance of higher rates by year-end. Next week’s CPI and PPI reports should impact expectations.Next Week Is Oracle and Econo-themedEarnings season is slowing to a crawl following this week’s biggies like Dell (DELL), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Broadcom (AVGO), and Snowflake (SNOW). Next week, Oracle (ORCL) is the one to watch for three big reasons: 1) It’s an AI bellwether2) Investors are worried about the company’s debt load3) It will give insights into enterprise software demand But the real action will be in economics with CPI, PPI, ADP Employment, and the ECB rate decision coming in. Not to mention, markets will be watching bond auctions because of ongoing concerns over interest rates and the FOMC.The Pristine Mentorship Is Open Sami Abusaad and James Rich Young’s Pristine Mentorship is open! In this video, they take you through how to build a trading plan, then tell you all about the program. Highly recommended:
Continue Reading -->Are You In The Biggest Trade In The USA?
There’s an aspect of human nature that makes us want money for nothing. Even the workaholics among us would gladly find more leisurely pursuits for their high-strung energy if the money rained down and into their coffers. Speculation is hard work, but many novices get into trading thinking all they’ve got to do is turn on the computer, open a brokerage account, and the money will come pouring in. If you’re reading this, you know that’s not how this works. As traders, if we want to make money, we’ve got to do the work and take risk. Taking risk is hard, because it makes you vulnerable to loss, but risk is a necessary part of reward. There is simply no way to earn a profit from the market without taking risk… Or is there? The concept of the “risk-free” rate always bugged me. They taught us this concept in university finance class, but I always thought it was a little bit bogus. It never made any sense to me that you could earn profit without any risk. I always felt the professors were neglecting to teach us about the real risks hidden in the risk-free rate. If you’ve gone through graduate or CFA level finance curriculum, or just used common sense, you’ll agree that my suspicion was correct. The truth is, even in the asset that we call risk-free there is still risk to your wealth if you own it. Of course I’m referring to US Treasury Bonds as the risk-free asset. When you buy a bond, you know exactly the return you will get if you hold it to maturity, so in that sense only is it a risk-free asset. The real risks you take on when you buy a bond are duration risk and reinvestment risk. If you buy a short term bond, there’s very little duration risk and some reinvestment risk, but with long bonds, there’s absolutely tons of duration risk. But for a trader, anytime you hear risk, you should think reward. There is no reward without risk, so when you hear risk-free, you should think “reward-free.” Short term US Bills are fairly risk-free, so that doesn’t interest me. However, the question I keep asking when trying to determine how to allocate my irreplaceable capital is: does the risk inherent in long duration US Treasury Bonds currently represent a great reward-to-risk setup? The best trades are the ones where the perceived risk is way higher than it actually is. Right now, we have a bit of a paradox occurring in the market: the supposedly risk-free asset is perceived to have the highest risk of any asset out there. Every conversation in the financial media is now centering around the riskiness of the risk-free asset, our debt. There’s too much of it is the oft repeated phrase. I agree, but the problem is, that was a concern for 2023. The time for worry has passed. Gold has doubled, and with that move from $2,000 to $4,700 (which I think will prove to be a short term top followed by a trip down to $3,825 before price moves much higher by 2028) we’ve already gone through the pricing in of a bad debt situation. Markets don’t price something in twice. We were already compensated for the risk of an out of control debt situation by owning gold since 2023. The debt level shouldn’t be traders’ focus any more, but interest rates should be. My view is that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and if I’m correct, we should see long rates come down as they price in lower growth and lower inflation next year. This is where duration risk can become duration reward for a willing trader. The TLT has tons of duration. Being a 20+ year bond ETF, it has the longest duration of any of the heavily traded bond instruments. You’re getting paid for taking that duration risk as well. TLT pays a monthly dividend from the underlying bond coupon payments of 4.7%. That’s as close as you’re ever going to get to “money for nothing” in my opinion. But how can a money for nothing opportunity exist? It’s because too many market participants are on the same side of the trade now. Everybody is bearish on US bonds and thinks rates can only go higher. Even Lacy Hunt finally threw in the towel and said he’s bearish on bonds. Where was he in 2020 when rates on the 10yr were 0.4%? From my vantage point, that was the time to be bearish on bonds, not now when they are at 4.7%. We haven’t seen rates this high in a long time. When rates on the long bond were last here, it was October 2023, and the Fed had completed its first full rate hike cycle since 2008. Inflation was out of control because checks were getting sent to every American man, woman, and child. Nothing remotely similar to that is happening now, but virtually all market participants are of the mind that inflation is coming, and more money printing is about to commence. The liabilities of the US Government have no where to go but up, they say. I’m not sure whether that’s true or not, but what about the asset side of the balance sheet? No one ever talks about the assets that back up that debt. It would be like talking about the guy with $350K mortgage debt, without ever mentioning the house that backs it up. The debt is only one half of the equation; the other half is the assets. The USA holds vast resources that exist as part of the invisible asset side of the balance sheet. Those assets include both natural resources and our productive labor. The physical assets of our country are in need of some capex maintenance, to be sure, but a conscientious revamp of our country’s federal land use policy, fiscal policy, regulatory policy, interstates, water rights, and airports would
Continue Reading -->This Is What Market Intervention Looks Like
It was many years ago, I can’t remember where (maybe in Market Wizards?), when I read that trading an equity position is like surfing: you feel the wave form underneath you, stand up on your board, and go along for the ride, shifting your balance to stay on long enough for the wave to carry you to shore. I was impelled to believe in the veracity of this mental image because it presented an idea of what trading was that naturally appealed to me: a skill that could be learned by doing. There was something so wholesome about the idea that markets are organic, bound by unseen natural forces; that they conform to natural rhythms to which we can attune our senses and predict their ebb and flow and thus, that they can be capitalized upon by simply being in tune with their rhythm. Back then, I believed that guys who pulled wealth out of the markets were the ones that were best able to feel the current of liquidity in the markets, put on a position, and just ride the currents of capital flows in a primal, visceral way, stripped down from all intellectual embellishment. When I finally made it to a trading desk in 2013, I was sitting next to the guys who “surfed” the market. They got rich by reacting to their natural instincts, formed over many years of operating in markets. But something changed that summer. That was the beginning of the QE era, where the natural forces of markets were overwhelmed by the dictate of central planners. Everything about the nature of markets started to change that summer. That is when almost all trading converted over to algorithmic trading. Instead of riding the waves of capital on the open ocean, if you wanted to survive, you had to abandon your instinct to feel the wave form underneath you, to be in tune with the tides. Instead, trading became a game of waiting for the signal from central planners that liquidity was on the way. Like a wave pool at a water amusement park, we had to just get in and wait for them to turn on the wave machine. Our waves became man made, precisely controlled, and merely imitations of the powerful forces of nature. Even the seasoned pros on the desk were struggling to adapt to the new environment. We had to find new tools to help us regain a sense of balance. It was the on the trading desk where I first learned the value of Twitter as a trading tool. Each of us had one of our six monitors dedicated to our lead trader’s Tweet Deck feed. He had a curated feed of the most important accounts on Twitter. Over time, as we were forced to adapt to the new market environment, we learned which accounts were the most valuable for their ability to cut through the noise and draw our attention to the signal. The lead trader’s favorite account back then was RedDogT3, Scott Redler’s Twitter handle – on my honor, a true story. Red Dog was one of the first guys to flag a signal, a sort of poker tell the market would show before it succumbed to the algorithmic robots, bent to the will of the central planners, and began the grind higher for the day. Back then the signal was AAPL. Every day, no matter how bearish the set up was, no matter how weak the entire market was, if AAPL went green, as Red Dog would point out, we knew it was time to cover shorts and scramble to get long something. After I left the trading desk, I ran an equity portfolio for a small RIA shop, and Twitter was still a useful tool if you knew who to follow for the signal. There was an account called BamaBroker that got popular because he was one of the only guys to pinpoint another signal that became the market’s tell during the Yellen Fed. He called it the “Bat Signal” and it was the early morning, pre-market, 8:00 AM yen smash. If he saw the USD/JPY flash green at 8:00 after a spike down move, he knew it was the central planners’ signal that market prices were being supported that day by systematic yen selling. Back then, policy makers wanted a weaker yen to induce more of the yen carry trade on a daily basis. The yen was much stronger back then as it took only 113 yen to buy $1 vs the 160 yen it requires now. Here’s a Bama tweet thread from Oct, 2017: And here is the USD/JPY on the morning Bama’s tweet describes: Below can be seen the correlation between the USD/JPY and the S&P futures back in October 2017. On days when the USD/JPY was bid up, the market was strong. When USD/JPY fell, the market couldn’t make upward progress. USD/JPY vs SPX in Oct 2017 (with yen intervention days annotated in green): Bama was an anonymous Twitter account until he got doxed one day. It turns out his dad ran a fancy RIA. Bama was rumored to be trading the ES in huge size and making clients good money, but his tweeting about it was a bad look for an old, blue blood, Southern gentry type of advisor. Bama’s account went dark and never returned. For many years I haven’t thought about the lessons I learned from his tweets. That is until this week. A couple weeks ago I wrote about Bessent’s intervention that squeezed me out of my SPY short. That was the first sign that bearish conditions would not be allowed to develop, and this past Wednesday, early in the pre-market, I saw the Bat Signal once again. USD/JPY this past Wed, Aug 19th: S&P 500 futures at the same time: This time, however, the Bat Signal is just the reverse of what it was in 2017 when Bama brought our attention to it. Now, the yen is
Continue Reading -->My Favorite Secret AI Stocks
What a week! Moderna (MRNA) announced a major cancer vaccine breakthrough. Rising Treasury yields have traders on edge, even with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cranking up buys of long-dated bonds. And Wal-Mart (WMT) announced disappointing sales. Now let’s dig into the most interesting stories in the market ahead of a very busy week for tech earnings and economics. Skip Ahead! Nvidia Needs a ShockJensen Huang’s Other Favorite Stock Is Reporting EarningsThese Banks Might Be the Best “Secret” AI StocksThe Great Biotech Short SqueezeTraders Are Still SkittishNext Week’s Calendar Is StackedThe Pristine Mentorship Is Open Nvidia Needs a ShockNvidia (NVDA) earnings are coming in hot on Wednesday, August 26.And it looks like we need a big monster beat and guidance to catapult the stock higher.The stock has sold off the day after earnings 4 straight times, and in 6 of the last 8 quarters. You can see this on the right-most column here:The culprit is shrinking revenue beats.Yes, the company is growing fast but gone are the days of giant revenue beats, which is the heart soul of momentum stocks.Nvidia always reports strong numbers, but they it’s been years since they’ve shocked the market with blockbuster sales and guidance.Will that change next week?With the way hyperscalers like Meta (META) and Alphabet (GOOGL)are spending money, anything is possible.But for now the bears seem to have the post-earnings advantage. Speaking of earnings…Jensen Huang’s Other Favorite Stock Is Reporting EarningsI’ll go out on a limb and say Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s #1 stock is Nvidia. His second favorite appears to be Marvell Technology (MRVL), a stock I bought myself. One reason I jumped on Marvell was because Mr. Huang called it “the next trillion dollar company” back in June. Marvell reports after the close Thursday. The company has its fingers in multiple AI data center applications, so we’ll get even more insights on AI infrastructure spending trends. Traders will also be eager for more details on Marvell’s monster chip deal with Google. To make a long story short, Google’s gonna spend a ton of money on Marvell chips. And in return, Google gets the right to buy up to 58,970,907 Marvell shares at $206.58. The more Google spends, the more Marvell shares it can buy. That’s great for Marvell shareholders because Google has a financial incentive in keeping Marvell’s stock price as high as possible. Jensen Huang gave me a reason to buy. Google gave me a new reason to stick with it. But with Marvell’s stock 44% off the June 29 lows, it’s hard to argue that expectations are anything but high:And on Friday, we saw an interesting piece of news from Marvell competitor Broadcom (AVGO), which makes me think…These Banks Might Be the Best “Secret” AI StocksBloomberg reported that Broadcom is looking to raise more than $60 billion in its newest AI debt financing deal.2026 has seen a wave of capital raises from the likes of Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL), Nebius (NBIS), CoreWeave (CRWV), Iren (IREN), Terawulf (WULF), and so on. And that money is going straight into AI infrastructure. Plus, it’s a major IPO year with SpaceX (SPCX), Cerebras Systems (CBRS), SK Hynix (SKHY), and eventually Anthropic, OpenAI, Databricks, and Stripe. And the M&A market has been quite strong thanks to megadeals like the Paramount/Warner Bros combination. This means lots of deal fees for investment banks like Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS), regardless of which actual AI companies end up dominating. And as long as AI doesn’t put the bankers out of business (it won’t), Wall Street will print money from AI-related dealmaking. So they are next on my buy list.The Great Biotech Short SqueezeThe State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) is up over 36% in 2026, putting it at #3 on our ETF leaderboard:Biotech got a turbo boost this week when Moderna (MRNA) announced successful trial results for an mRNA vaccine for melanoma. But what many people are missing about the biotech boom is the impact of short squeezes. The XBI ETF itself has short interest of 116%, because ETF shares can apparently be borrowed and shorted multiple times. And the average stock in the XBI ETF has short interest of 14.3%. For comparison, the average short interest of a stock in the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is just 4.0%.Traders Are Still SkittishThe latest AAII Sentiment Survey shows that 35.5% of investors are bullish.This is the 5th straight week of below-average bullishness, which I chalk up to stubborn inflation (I mean the real inflation we feel, not government numbers) and other economic concerns. So even with equities near record highs, the crowd is unwilling to say “I love this and we’re going higher.” On balance, this is positive because it implies a lack of euphoria. Meanwhile, the CNN Fear & Greed Index, is at 57, indicating modest Greed.So sentiment remains neutral overall. There just aren’t strong feeling on either side.Next Week’s Calendar Is StackedAside from Nvidia and Marvell’s earnings, we have a lot going on next week. In economics, we have CB Consumer Confidence, Core PCE Price Index, GDP, and Durable Goods. And of course there’s a chance Fed Chair Kevin Warsh makes a market-moving announcement at Jackson Hole on Friday. And on the earnings side, we’ll be watching CrowdStrike (CRWD), Salesforce (CRM), AutoDesk (ADS), and Workday (WDAY), which will give us key insights on software demand amid concerns about encroachments from AI. Here’s the full calendar:The Pristine Mentorship Is Open Sami Abusaad and James Rich Young’s Pristine Mentorship is open! In this video, they take you through how to build a trading plan, then tell you all about the program. Highly recommended:
Continue Reading -->Your Unique Talent Is Your Greatest Asset in Trading
“Money grows when it’s allocated deliberately, not constantly.” – Jessie Livermore Professional speculation, at its core, is a game of questions and deductions: questions are posed, deductions are made, and bets are placed. We know we’ve deduced correctly when a profit is shown and wrongly when a loss occurs. It’s always been the difficult questions that lack apparent answers that have interested me. In the act of deductive reasoning to answer difficult questions is where the profitable opportunities lie. Life outside the stock market has the same quality: it’s in searching for answers to the existential questions that are difficult to answer where the most opportunities lie. The most difficult question I’ve ever had to think about came from a friend some years ago. Over lunch he asked me a seemingly simple question, but I fumbled for an adequate response: “what is your talent?” That question sent my neurons jumping across synapses in all directions inside my brain, but none were able to come back on a return path with the correct information to articulate a clear response. I ended up blurting out something rather incoherent about being “able to interpret reality properly.” The cynical look on his face betrayed his genuine incredulity that my response had been formed with any modicum of introspection. That question was posed to me over seven years ago, but now I have a veracious reply: it’s patience. My talent is that I’m able to exercise extreme patience after I’ve deduced that an outcome is certain. Scrolling through thousands of charts a week, I’ve deduced several certain outcomes are now developing. Below are three charts of prices that want to move higher: the TNX, the USD/JPY, and the AW futures contract. TNX, (10yr yield): USD/JPY, (the quote of this contract is inverse of the convention so the price is actually yen per dollar; the higher this price is, the weaker the yen): /AW (Bloomberg Commodity Index Futures): The difficult question the speculator must ask is: “will these prices be allowed to move higher?” In the case of the dollar/yen and the 10yr yield, it’s obvious after last week’s intervention that the answer is a hard NO. That leaves only commodities as the most fertile ground for the speculator to toil in. Commodities are the only asset that policy makers cannot influence indefinitely because they are tethered to the physical world, whereas fiat and bonds are purely abstractions. While the appeal of commodities is probably obvious to most market participants by now, their risk is perhaps less frequently discussed. I’ve learned that professional speculation requires one to think risk first. If one produces enough well-reasoned trade ideas, managing the loss on the incorrect ideas will ensure a steady profit, given enough repeatable trials. Speculating in commodity stocks requires an extra degree of focus on risk because of the commodity producers’ pronounced boom/bust cycle and tendency to trade with valuations inversely correlated to the cycle. This means that buying commodity producer stocks is not as easy as buying a growth stock and holding. Commodity stocks have to be bought deliberately and sold intentionally. Theoretically, they should be bought when their trailing twelve month PE is highest or even negative, because that will be an indication that they are being bought at the bottom of the cycle after economic weakness reduces their earnings to almost nothing. They should be sold when their earnings are accelerating after a period of increase. Ostensively we can look at the gold miners as a recent example of how commodity producers should be bought and sold. In 2023, NEM had lost $2B but traded at about a $40B market cap. The sky-high PE was due to many years of depressed earnings with a gold price that refused to move above its cost of production. This was the time to buy. In 2025, NEM made $11B in pretax earnings, and traded at a very cheap 10x PE. That was the time to sell. I had the trade of a lifetime in gold miners from 2023 to March of 2026, and while I’ve still got a chunk of my original position in the big 5 miners, I’m in no rush to build back my position. If metals and mining stocks aren’t yet in the right buy point of the cycle, why is the Bloomberg Commodity Index drawing my attention? Here’s the question the astute speculator must now ask: “with the business cycle clearly entering the contraction phase, why is the Bloomberg Commodity Index trying to break higher?” The answer to that question is that the largest components of the index are energy and agriculture. We all know the reasons crude started it’s ramp this spring. Normally, after a move up on conflict escalation fears I would be inclined to dump my energy stocks like XOM and CVX and my agriculture stocks like NTR, but not this time. In fact, I’m waiting with patience for the right spot to add. I’ve also written about my inclination to bid on pipeline stocks recently. I’ve studied food and energy price spikes extensively this year, and there is one thing in common that all food and energy price spike periods share that the astute speculator can key in on: a long period of supply drawdowns followed by a sudden supply crunch. In 1971, Nixon introduced price controls on domestic oil, which caused a supply drawdown as it was unprofitable to increase production. The real oil price spike didn’t occur until 1974 when Arab oil was under embargo. This is the pattern: sustained supply draw down for a couple years, then sudden supply crunch, followed by a price spike. The pattern also plays out in food price spikes. While the pattern is similar, the motivations and human nature are more readily observed with the grain price spikes of the past. In 1988 there was an extreme grain price spike, and it fits the template: a sustained period of supply draw down starting in 1985 when agricultural legislation was passed
Continue Reading -->This Micron Chart Is Insane
What a week! Our hero SanDisk (SNDK) delighted investors with its Investor Day, earnings season kept on cruising along, and the CPI/PPI reports helped quell fears over inflation. So let’s dig into the 5 things you need to know about markets right now. Use the table of contents to skip ahead: Skip Ahead! It Was a BAD Week for Michael Burry and AI ShortsThis Micron Chart Is InsaneEarnings Season Has Been Amazing4 Reasons SanDisk Is KINGTraders Are a Little Bearish It Was a BAD Week for Michael Burry and AI ShortsMichael Burry of “The Big Short” fame made headlines this week. Among other moves, he increased his Micron (MU) short and put on a big QQQ put options position. The problem is that AI shorts are getting crushed. First, SanDisk’s (SNDK) Investor Day was very well-received, pushing up other AI stocks like Micron in sympathy. Second, did you see the monster post-earnings moves in Nebius (NBIS), CoreWeave (CRWV), and Lumentum Holdings (LITE) this week? They are the three most heavily shorted stocks in the Nasdaq 100.And they are among the top-10 performers in the index this month. Plus the QQQs have been grinding up, which eats away the value of put positions. So let’s talk about what makes shorting a stock like Micron so tricky.This Micron Chart Is InsaneHistorically, memory and storage have been highly cyclical. But thanks to the AI boom, demand is outstripping supply like never before. Micron can’t even meet half of customer demand, based on comments from a KeyBanc conference. Customers are insensitive to memory prices, and some are signing deals out to 2030. This supports the “this time it’s structural, not cyclical” argument. And if we look at historical earnings for Micron, you can see how things have changed.In the last two cyclical earnings peaks, Micron earned: -$2.59 per share in Q3 2022-$3.53 per share in Q4 2018 But in Q3 of 2026 the company earned $25.11 per share. By shorting Micron, you are saying this is the peak. But look at that chart again. If Micron can earn $25 a share in a quarter, how can you count out $50? Or $100? And the memory/storage boom is just one reason…Earnings Season Has Been AmazingQ2 earnings season has been absurdly strong, according to FactSet data. Q2 revenue growth is tracking at 15.0%. Back on June 30, analysts expected just 12.2% growth.This is the highest since Q4 2021, when the economy was rebounding from the Pandemic lows. The tech sector has been a major contributor with 35.9% growth thanks to huge numbers from AI-driven names like the aforementioned Micron and SanDisk. We can always say the most obvious thing in the world: “It can’t get much better than this.” But even 3 years ago, people were saying the AI bubble was going to pop. And AI spending just keeps going through the roof as companies trip over themselves to buy servers, GPUs, memory, and other hardware. Speaking of SanDisk…4 Reasons SanDisk Is KINGSanDisk’s Thursday Investor Day was going well. And then the company said it would return 100% Excess Cash to Shareholders. Then things started going REALLY well. The stock took off like a rocket:That was great for my 1,000 shares of SanDisk! Oh, excuse me. That was a typo. I own 1 share of SanDisk. (as in ONE) But the bull case here is obvious:Solid revenue growth back by long-term customer agreementsDirt-cheap valuationSuper-high margins and cash flowThe company will buy back tons of stock in the years to comeOf course, it’s hard to chase a stock that’s up 587% year-to-date. (my entry was $1,587 so I’m not pretending I caught it early) BTW, you can get David Prince’s takes on SanDisk and the AI landscape here:Traders Are a Little BearishThe AAII Sentiment Survey shows that investor sentiment is just all over the place week to week. 34.7% of investors are bullish, which is slightly below the long-term average of 37.5%.Technically, this is the fourth straight week of below-average bullishness, despite a string of all-time highs. I take this as positive, because it implies there is still a lot of doubt facing this market. Meanwhile, CNN’s Fear & Greed Index is at 65/100, signifying modest Greed: See you next week kids!
Continue Reading -->Treasury Secretary’s Memo to Market Bears: Drop Dead.
The short setup into the FOMC decision last week was one of the best I’ve ever seen: during an ominous time of the year where crashes occur, the stock market was being pushed closer to the edge by 10yr US Treasury bond rates rising in response to pressure on the Bank of Japan (BOJ) to hike rates and in response to pressure on the Japanese Ministry of Finance (MOF) to sell dollar assets to buy yen in order to stop yen weakness. I had been on the lookout for a rate hike by a foreign monetary authority that would cause the initial break in the market which could lead to a crash just like the 1987 and 1929 crashes, both of which had foreign bank rate hikes as the catalysts. The BOJ was the obvious candidate for a hike as their currency was in free fall, and their domestic population was clamoring for authorities to stop the pain. The MOF would normally intervene in the FX market by selling US Treasuries to buy yen, but that option was off the table as Scott Bessent can’t have rates in the US rise. I thought the BOJ would be forced to hike, which would pull money out of US assets and into Japan. I laid out my reasoning for a low risk short and was short the SPY from just above $740. Instead of a BOJ hike, what we got was a coordinated intervention between the US and Japan with Scott Bessent as the front man, complete with a full media appearance tour and planted photos of Bessent’s memo pad detailing his secret plan to buy yen for $5-$10B. Bessent’s move was a masterful stroke that averted a crisis in the stock market by offering Japan a reprieve without requiring them to either hike rates or sell Treasuries. The very public announcement that the US will not allow the yen to weaken further was enough to put the squeeze on shorts like me (fortunately, I followed my plan to cover and took a 2.5% loss). Bessent’s public statement in support of the yen is enough to take any notion of shorting this market off the table for now, but it also revealed the Achilles heel of the entire global financial system: the yen carry trade. We caught a glimpse of the importance of the yen carry exactly 2 years ago when the BOJ was forced to raise rates off the zero bound to 0.25%. On August 5, 2024 the SPX gapped down, and a full blown melt down was a real concern. The BOJ helped calm the panic by promising not to raise rates again any time soon. The panic level was high enough for Jamie Dimon to release an absurd statement that most of the yen carry trade had been unwound, and there was no reason to be concerned about a market melt down. Jamie is too smart to think that’s true so it’s obvious he was being compelled to sooth the highly leveraged speculative community and their brokers and to convince them to ease off the short yen covering and margin calls. The dire situation of a yen carry unwind was allowed to grow acute in August 2024, but Bessent was taking no chances this time around in 2026 and preemptively intervened before the stock market could weaken. In doing so, he revealed the lynch pin to the asset price bubble we now find ourselves in, and while he may have relieved the pressure building up to that point, neither he nor the BOJ did anything to alter the underlying dynamics of the situation. While Bessent may have altered the path we are taking, I don’t think he was able to change the ultimate destination at which we will eventually arrive: a significantly lower stock market. I think this short squeeze will buy enough time for Wall Street to get out two more big IPOs: OpenAI and Anthropic. One of the greats, Paul Tudor Jones, lays out his case for why those IPOs will likely signal the top in the market. I’m not as smart or as rich as PTJ, so I’ll just adopt his opinion until he changes it. I won’t have a chance at getting anywhere near as rich as PTJ if I dig my heels in on the short side. I’m still bearish, but I’ve got very little trading inventory left to sell and way too much cash if this is the start of a melt up into the IPOs. As bearish as I’ve grown the past month, I managed to resist the temptation to prematurely sell what few longs I’ve got until the time was right. FTK was an easy ride until the recent sell off from $27 to $22, but I reviewed my trade plan when the temptation to bail out of the trade seemed to be on the verge of overpowering my holding discipline. It was a gamble holding over earnings, but I figured the odds were on my side based on the monthly chart and the acceleration in business described on its last report. The bet paid off. DAC was another great win that I locked in this week. With these two trading positions moved out of inventory, I’ve only got a little bit of ATUSF, NTR, XOM, and CVX left in long inventory. I’ve still got a large chunk of the gold miners as long term position trades I put on in 2023. My trades in FTK and DAC are a reminder to myself that my process works. I have a strict set of criteria for putting on longs and sticking to that discipline has been profitable all year. I’ll only buy stocks when I get the setup I’m looking for, like FTK at $18, DAC at $100, MT at $34, ATUSF at $20, XOM at $120, or CVX at $156. If you look at those on a chart, you can see the tight price structure I am looking for. If
Continue Reading -->Nvidia: The Force Awakens
What a week! We had a light jobs report. SanDisk (SNDK) and Western Digital (WDC) hit me where it hurt (my account). And SpaceX delivered its first earnings report as a public company. So let’s jump into what you need to know right now, including the earnings season boom, Nvidia’s (NVDA) monster comeback… and even how Caterpillar (CAT) turned into an AI stock.Earnings Season Has Been Awesome. But Not for SanDisk.Q2 earning season has been ridiculously strong, according to FactSet data. 86% of reporting companies have beaten EPS estimates, the highest percentage since Q2 2021. And earnings are coming in a ridiculous 29.2% above expectations, the highest since at least 2008. Excluding Alphabet (GOOGL) and Amazon’s (AMZN) large one-time investment gains, earnings would still be 10.9% above estimates. Earnings growth is tracking at a whopping 32.0% excluding GOOGL and AMZN. Unfortunately, our biggest, brightest shining star SanDisk (SNDK) got taken to the woodshed. The flash memory maker delivered a strong report, but its guidance disappointed and the stock got smacked around. The same happened with Western Digital (WDC). Now SanDisk is almost 50% off its highs! But fun fact: SanDisk is still the #1 stock in the S&P 500 index this year: Get JR Romero’s latest take on SanDisk here.Meet the Guidance MonsterLast Friday, I said power management semiconductor stock Monolithic Power (MPWR) may be the new SanDisk. And I bought the stock on Monday. SanDisk and Western Digital’s (WDC) guidance disappointments took them out of a unique category of AI stock I call “Guidance Monsters.” These are the AI stocks that deliver revenue guidance so strong that even the biggest bulls can’t believe it. Monolithic Power is seeing wild demand from data center clients. And last week, its Q3 revenue guidance came in 17% above consensus. You have to think that the company plans to handily beat that guidance. See the lines going up and to the right? Those are consensus earnings estimates:This is exactly what you want to see with high-octane growth stocks. Note: I also own SanDisk and Western Digital, so I didn’t have a bang-up week on the AI front.The Nvidia Value Trap Debate Ends for NowI’ve been suggesting Nvidia might be a value trap based on its cheap valuation. That was dead wrong because the stock just woke up:This week, the stock got a nice boost when Elon Musk said SpaceX (SPCX) will exclusively buy Nvidia chips over AI chipmakers like AMD (AMD). I’ve been wondering myself where Nvidia could find its next big customer, and SpaceX may be just that. I have my doubts about how soon we’ll see fully operational data centers in space, but SpaceX’s capex spending is going through the roof. JP Morgan said “we now project capex of nearly $200B in both 2027 & 2028.” A decent chunk of that will flow through to Nvidia.It’s Gonna Be Another Busy Week for AIWhile most big companies have reported, multiple key AI/semiconductor names will report earnings next week, including: Tuesday: Lumentum Holdings (LITE), CoreWeave (CRWV), Super Micro (SMCI)Wednesday: Cisco (CSCO), Coherent (COHR), Cerebras Systems (CBRS)Thursday: Applied Materials (AMAT) So we’ll have even more inputs to help us deal with the ultimate question: Will the spending ever stop? Everyone from Alphabet (GOOGL) to Meta (META) to Amazon (AMZN) to SpaceX is throwing wild amounts of money at AI infrastructure projects. Heck, Caterpillar (CAT) raised guidance because of AI data center buildouts. So maybe we’ll add CAT to our list of AI stocks… Here’s the full calendar for next week:Traders Are… Confused?The AAII Sentiment Survey shows that investor sentiment is just all over the place week to week. 37.0% of investors are bullish, which is right in-line with the long-term average of 37.5%. This follows two straight weeks of bearish readings.This continues the trend of there being no real trend from week to week. Meanwhile, CNN’s Fear & Greed Index popped to 63/100, signifying modest Greed: Of course, if the market dips 2% next week, sentiment will swing back bearish in the blink of an eye. So it’s getting harder and harder to make sense of sentiment data, because there’s never any sustained string of positive or negative readings. Oh well… Have a great weekend!
Continue Reading -->